Politics and the media

About a fortnight ago, a friend asked me how I felt about the rising torrent of racism and intolerance that has engulfed the UK in recent weeks. The answer is complicated. We have all seen a renewed obsession with St. George's Cross, plastered across buildings, roads and houses across the country. Culminating in 'Unite the Kingdom', the largest far-right gathering in London, consisting of almost 150,000 people , flag-bearing has once again reignited the perennial immigration conversation.  "Scary, isn't it?", my friend asked. Indeed, lots has happened in the two weeks since to reinforce that feeling for anyone of colour in the UK. Yet, with an air of inevitable cynicism, I disagreed. "To be scared evokes a feeling of surprise, shock and anger. It's hard to feel that when it's been so the path has been built long before this month." Racism is entrenched within this country, and it's not just from the working-class. It's not just from t...

 The phrase "now or never" is often overused hyperbole. Yet it does at least feel like we are reaching a tipping point in society, and one that is fracturing a growing chasm between younger generations. With the digital revolution empowering people to control their own consumption and interaction with the world, Gen Z are choosing individualism over unity.  Online safety has dominated the headlines recently, with Stephen Graham's gripping Netflix drama Adolescence  charting the pervasive dangers of the 'manosphere', the Andrew Tate-like content that young men and teenage boys are increasingly turning towards. These influencers are weaponising culture wars, stoking division in young people through gender lines.  Adolescence (Netflix) It is no surprise then, that recent data from Ipsos UK and the Global Institute for Women’s Leadership at King’s College London highlights that Gen Z men and women are the most divided generation when it comes to the subject of gender ...

Waking up the morning of November 8th, to the new of Donald Trump's re-election as U.S President - I sighed. There was none of the shock or disappointment of his initial election eight years earlier, or the anger and incredulity of 6th January 2021, where Trump's emboldened supporters stormed the U.S Capitol building for the most ridiculous coup d'état attempt.  No, instead, there was a grim sense of inevitability about the most divisive figure in modern global politics becoming the most powerful man in the world for a second time.  Trump's election is symbolic. For this is a man who, since his formal intention to run for President in 2015 - has thrived on propelling division and hatred. Some of his many moments include  questioning  the legitimacy of Obama's birth certificate, making policy announcements on social media, and telling people to drink bleach to protect against COVID-19.  It comes at a time where society seems at a crossroads, as social media misin...

 Hasn’t the last five years felt like a long time?  In the run up to the December 2019 General Election four and a half years ago, I remember using social media to say “do your own research, and go vote for whatever you believe in”. There was, and still is, some reason in that - youth turnout in politics is still so lamentably low, and it’s partly why we see political change that does nothing to help young people. So do please vote on Thursday. But perhaps I was overly naïve in the run-up to that election, because things are a lot different now. In 2019, I was disenfranchised with the political system, cynical of all politicians looking to support their own political careers. After the wave of Jeremy Corbyn’s unexpected result in 2017,  why was it to be too different this time? And would it have had that much of a consequence? The last five years have laid bare everything I could - and maybe should - have learnt before. There are no positive words to describe what Boris J...

It does not take a genius to spot the obvious contradictions in geopolitical narratives of Western governments and media evident over the past few decades. The US' post-9/11 botched "war on terror", that created a generation of instability in the Middle East, has served as the driver for European countries to lament the subsequent influx of migrants and legitimise the xenophobic desires of far-right parties. More recently, the same states have rightfully isolated Russia for their invasion of Ukraine - despite the similarity to their atrocities after 2001. Yet in the past three months, they have managed to brazenly exhibit their hypocrisy to an extent that I, and evidently many others, find astounding. And any long-time readers will know I've been more than happy to highlight duplicity of Western countries on this blog, so that should tell you something about how bizarre recent events feel. Source: UNRWA, via The Wire In response to the militant group Hamas' terror...

In some ways, this blog comes full circle to the very second post I wrote on  here circa six years ago .  That time, in the aftermath of the 2017 Las Vegas shooting, the blog focused on how names and stories appeal to our emotion more than facts and figures. Boy can I see the difference in writing style - 17 year old Kabir bizarrely quoted Stalin in making the point.  What I grappled with, and have done for a while since, is the unnatural and paradoxically natural emotional response to scales of tragedy. Hundreds of thousands dying is harder to comprehend than ten that are accompanied by names and faces. Yet more people dying is obviously worse globally. Ironically, I forgot the shooting’s details, which in itself encapsulates the point.  These limits of human empathy are (at least to me) fascinating, but they pose some problems in the globalised, interconnected world we now live in. In a world where our media consumption plays such a key role in how we ...