Skip to main content

Terrorism - can we ever truly understand it?


We might think we have a sufficient grasp of terrorism and its influence on the modern world.

A definition of terrorism that I read earlier: ‘the unofficial or unauthorised use of violence and intimidation in pursuit of political aims’.

For after all, terrorists are just the ones acting alone to destroy our Western civilisation, often pre-meditated and as part of a group, in the name of some form of God. Right?

Not quite. Terrorism is a concept that has been deep-rooted in society for centuries, yet the label has only surfaced so vehemently in the last 70-80 years.

The word ‘terrorist’ comes from the French Revolution of the 18th century. The staunchly left-wing group in the country were ‘The Jacobins’ and at the time they were given the tag of ‘terroristes’ due to their attempted brutal suppression of opposition and their failing monarchical system, along with any supporters, in a period that has aptly been named ‘The Terror’.

However, historians have traced the roots of terrorism, depending partly on its definition, to the 1st century. A radical offshoot group of the Zealots, in Judaea, mainly targeted their Jewish rulers and other wealthy elitist groups in the hope of unsettling their regimes.

Another key person in the development of terrorism was an Italian revolutionary leader, Felice Orsini, who attempted to assassinate Napoleon III, French Emperor. He acted alone, throwing three bombs and killing 8 bystanders, whilst injuring over one hundred.

Other examples include groups such as the Narodniks in Russia in the build up to the 1917 Russian Revolution, and the IRA, famous for their attempts to disrupt and take control of Ireland by use of terror in the late 20th century.

All these examples mentioned are ones that attempt to threaten their own countries’ regimes, they are internal threats.

Which is what makes the more recent rise of Al-Qaeda and IS so strange.

Clearly these groups are acting with the intention of damaging people and cultures on the opposite side of the globe.

And even without knowing it, they can influence and affect us. For indoctrinating a single person, whom may they not even know of, people that are much like Felice Orsini before, they are causing masses of destruction around the world.

There have been too many examples for me to mention over the past few years. Obviously, the notable ones are 9/11 and 7/7, events which shocked the world.

And in this regard, they are clearly at the forefront of our minds, they have had some influence for sure, but how much have they affected our way of life and how we see them?

We would like to say that they won’t ever damage us, that we will stand together and not let it get to us, but in reality, terrorists have changed the way we approach our daily lives.

The infamous example, after the 7/7 bombings, is the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes, an innocent Brazilian man who was shot to death by the Metropolitan Police as a result of the bombings. It is clear that this wouldn’t have happened without the terrorist event in the first place.

Even the concept perhaps intimidates us. For although it would not be right for me to directly associate Muslims with these attacks, the majority of recent IS attacks have been Muslims pushing against the West and their direct involvement in the Middle East. It has led to a divide in our country, Muslims and religious minorities have felt the brunt of many people’s frustrations.

This was illustrated in 2016, with the issue of Brexit. The result and vote may not have been to do with immigration, but much propaganda was raised, on both sides, about this issue.

And again, it is doubtful that this would have come about if the rate terrorism hadn’t arisen in recent years. Things like the unemployment rate are slowly decreasing, and time will only tell, but even from an economic point of view, in my opinion, leaving made little sense – showing the impact of terrorism.

Unfortunately, this is now unavoidable in our society.

Terrorism is forever going to impact the Western (and the rest for that matter) world and there is very little we can do to escape that. The simple shock and fear that the terrorists, be that a single person or a group organised attack, create in amongst us, in our towns and communities, is evidence that they are doing their job. Their primary aim is to divide us apart, at the very heart of our lives.

Until we realise this, we won’t fully understand terrorism as a concept. Given that it is so destructive and divisive, this would be a very scary prospect indeed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

As Western governments wilfully ignore events in Palestine, they have lost the trust of their own people - and crucially, the Global South

It does not take a genius to spot the obvious contradictions in geopolitical narratives of Western governments and media evident over the past few decades. The US' post-9/11 botched "war on terror", that created a generation of instability in the Middle East, has served as the driver for European countries to lament the subsequent influx of migrants and legitimise the xenophobic desires of far-right parties. More recently, the same states have rightfully isolated Russia for their invasion of Ukraine - despite the similarity to their atrocities after 2001. Yet in the past three months, they have managed to brazenly exhibit their hypocrisy to an extent that I, and evidently many others, find astounding. And any long-time readers will know I've been more than happy to highlight duplicity of Western countries on this blog, so that should tell you something about how bizarre recent events feel. Source: UNRWA, via The Wire In response to the militant group Hamas' terror

We must better consider all the people caught up in modern-day warfare

In some ways, this blog comes full circle to the very second post I wrote on  here circa six years ago .  That time, in the aftermath of the 2017 Las Vegas shooting, the blog focused on how names and stories appeal to our emotion more than facts and figures. Boy can I see the difference in writing style - 17 year old Kabir bizarrely quoted Stalin in making the point.  What I grappled with, and have done for a while since, is the unnatural and paradoxically natural emotional response to scales of tragedy. Hundreds of thousands dying is harder to comprehend than ten that are accompanied by names and faces. Yet more people dying is obviously worse globally. Ironically, I forgot the shooting’s details, which in itself encapsulates the point.  These limits of human empathy are (at least to me) fascinating, but they pose some problems in the globalised, interconnected world we now live in. In a world where our media consumption plays such a key role in how we perceive and interpret l

Light at the End of the Tunnel

It is never a bad thing to ask for help, contrary to what the mind, or even society, might say. Unfortunately for me, whilst sat there in floods of tears at my kitchen table, the whole tissue box I had emptied littered on the floor, I didn’t realise it. It was a Wednesday evening in late January, I had just gone through a day of school feeling perfectly content – bar the worries many teenagers find themselves under. I recall feeling focused in the three lessons I had that day, and playing football in the afternoon, I imagined, would only help my mood. After all, they do say exercise helps balance the chemicals in your brain. But I got home, sat down and genuinely considered suicide. What possibly is there left here for me? How is it ever going to feel like life is worth living? The weeks of building anxiety and depression had taken their toll. School stress, A-levels closing in. Social stress (ever-increasing in an age where social media has become habitual). Coupled with en