Skip to main content

What does Robert Mugabe's resignation mean for Zimbabwe?


The impeachment and now subsequent resignation of Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe marks a new era in the country – but how will they cope in eradicating the remnants of his brutal regime?

93-year-old Mugabe has characterised Zimbabwe, his name so associated with the country to us these days, and he divided opinion in his long rule of power. Some within the country always have seen him as a hero, others and many around the globe view him as a savage ruler who exploited the country for his own gain.

Mugabe always maintained that his government were fighting both capitalism and communism and chastised the West for what he suggested was a plot to worsen the Zimbabwean economy due to their distaste of him.

It was always the military that helped him maintain his authority within the country, and their loyalty towards him was inevitably going to fizzle out sooner or later. The trigger for this was the sudden sacking of a man who had been his recent Vice-President and long-term friend, Emmerson Mnangagwa, and his decision to instate his 52-year-old wife Grace into Mnangagwa’s position, carrying on the family’s influence in politics.

The long-time dictator was put under house-arrest by the army and has since announced his resignation as President of Zimbabwe, sparking vehement celebrations in many areas of the country.

Evidently, this is a step forward for democracy in Zimbabwe, can they capitalise economically and enforce fair elections too?

Mnangagwa has promised to reconcile the country with the rest of the world – politically they became quite isolated under Mugabe, has stated that ‘acts of corruption must stop’ and also said that there would be elections in 2018 as planned.

On the face of it, this all seems very rosy. But when you delve deeper into the new man at the helm, it remains uncertain as to whether Zimbabwe can root out wrongdoing from their government.

Mnangagwa is often seen as the man who engineered the masses of civilian murders in the civil conflicts in the 1980s, it is estimated that 20,000 people were murdered under his jurisdiction.

And the divided political and social nature of the country will undoubtedly pose challenges to the new regime, only when problems start to emerge will we truly know just how democratic this government are willing to be.

Much like Kenya a month before though, this is a step in the right direction. Dictatorial regimes are being toppled, and even if the new ones don’t prove to be as fair as we would hope, this illustrates that democracy can prevail.

It has been 37 long years since Zimbabwe celebrated independence from Britain’s colonial empire officially, but it might only be now that they have properly achieved it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

As Western governments wilfully ignore events in Palestine, they have lost the trust of their own people - and crucially, the Global South

It does not take a genius to spot the obvious contradictions in geopolitical narratives of Western governments and media evident over the past few decades. The US' post-9/11 botched "war on terror", that created a generation of instability in the Middle East, has served as the driver for European countries to lament the subsequent influx of migrants and legitimise the xenophobic desires of far-right parties. More recently, the same states have rightfully isolated Russia for their invasion of Ukraine - despite the similarity to their atrocities after 2001. Yet in the past three months, they have managed to brazenly exhibit their hypocrisy to an extent that I, and evidently many others, find astounding. And any long-time readers will know I've been more than happy to highlight duplicity of Western countries on this blog, so that should tell you something about how bizarre recent events feel. Source: UNRWA, via The Wire In response to the militant group Hamas' terror

We must better consider all the people caught up in modern-day warfare

In some ways, this blog comes full circle to the very second post I wrote on  here circa six years ago .  That time, in the aftermath of the 2017 Las Vegas shooting, the blog focused on how names and stories appeal to our emotion more than facts and figures. Boy can I see the difference in writing style - 17 year old Kabir bizarrely quoted Stalin in making the point.  What I grappled with, and have done for a while since, is the unnatural and paradoxically natural emotional response to scales of tragedy. Hundreds of thousands dying is harder to comprehend than ten that are accompanied by names and faces. Yet more people dying is obviously worse globally. Ironically, I forgot the shooting’s details, which in itself encapsulates the point.  These limits of human empathy are (at least to me) fascinating, but they pose some problems in the globalised, interconnected world we now live in. In a world where our media consumption plays such a key role in how we perceive and interpret l

Light at the End of the Tunnel

It is never a bad thing to ask for help, contrary to what the mind, or even society, might say. Unfortunately for me, whilst sat there in floods of tears at my kitchen table, the whole tissue box I had emptied littered on the floor, I didn’t realise it. It was a Wednesday evening in late January, I had just gone through a day of school feeling perfectly content – bar the worries many teenagers find themselves under. I recall feeling focused in the three lessons I had that day, and playing football in the afternoon, I imagined, would only help my mood. After all, they do say exercise helps balance the chemicals in your brain. But I got home, sat down and genuinely considered suicide. What possibly is there left here for me? How is it ever going to feel like life is worth living? The weeks of building anxiety and depression had taken their toll. School stress, A-levels closing in. Social stress (ever-increasing in an age where social media has become habitual). Coupled with en