What does Robert Mugabe's resignation mean for Zimbabwe?

The impeachment and now subsequent resignation of Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe marks a new era in the country – but how will they cope in eradicating the remnants of his brutal regime?

93-year-old Mugabe has characterised Zimbabwe, his name so associated with the country to us these days, and he divided opinion in his long rule of power. Some within the country always have seen him as a hero, others and many around the globe view him as a savage ruler who exploited the country for his own gain.

Mugabe always maintained that his government were fighting both capitalism and communism and chastised the West for what he suggested was a plot to worsen the Zimbabwean economy due to their distaste of him.

It was always the military that helped him maintain his authority within the country, and their loyalty towards him was inevitably going to fizzle out sooner or later. The trigger for this was the sudden sacking of a man who had been his recent Vice-President and long-term friend, Emmerson Mnangagwa, and his decision to instate his 52-year-old wife Grace into Mnangagwa’s position, carrying on the family’s influence in politics.

The long-time dictator was put under house-arrest by the army and has since announced his resignation as President of Zimbabwe, sparking vehement celebrations in many areas of the country.

Evidently, this is a step forward for democracy in Zimbabwe, can they capitalise economically and enforce fair elections too?

Mnangagwa has promised to reconcile the country with the rest of the world – politically they became quite isolated under Mugabe, has stated that ‘acts of corruption must stop’ and also said that there would be elections in 2018 as planned.

On the face of it, this all seems very rosy. But when you delve deeper into the new man at the helm, it remains uncertain as to whether Zimbabwe can root out wrongdoing from their government.

Mnangagwa is often seen as the man who engineered the masses of civilian murders in the civil conflicts in the 1980s, it is estimated that 20,000 people were murdered under his jurisdiction.

And the divided political and social nature of the country will undoubtedly pose challenges to the new regime, only when problems start to emerge will we truly know just how democratic this government are willing to be.

Much like Kenya a month before though, this is a step in the right direction. Dictatorial regimes are being toppled, and even if the new ones don’t prove to be as fair as we would hope, this illustrates that democracy can prevail.

It has been 37 long years since Zimbabwe celebrated independence from Britain’s colonial empire officially, but it might only be now that they have properly achieved it.

Comments

As Western governments wilfully ignore events in Palestine, they have lost the trust of their own people - and crucially, the Global South

It does not take a genius to spot the obvious contradictions in geopolitical narratives of Western governments and media evident over the past few decades. The US' post-9/11 botched "war on terror", that created a generation of instability in the Middle East, has served as the driver for European countries to lament the subsequent influx of migrants and legitimise the xenophobic desires of far-right parties. More recently, the same states have rightfully isolated Russia for their invasion of Ukraine - despite the similarity to their atrocities after 2001. Yet in the past three months, they have managed to brazenly exhibit their hypocrisy to an extent that I, and evidently many others, find astounding. And any long-time readers will know I've been more than happy to highlight duplicity of Western countries on this blog, so that should tell you something about how bizarre recent events feel. Source: UNRWA, via The Wire In response to the militant group Hamas' terror...

With an election upon us, we must make sure to get some long-awaited change

Hasn’t the last five years felt like a long time? In the run up to the December 2019 General Election four and a half years ago, I remember using social media to say “do your own research, and go vote for whatever you believe in”. There was, and still is, some reason in that - youth turnout in politics is still so lamentably low, and it’s partly why we see political change that does nothing to help young people. So do please vote on Thursday. But perhaps I was overly naïve in the run-up to that election, because things are a lot different now. In 2019, I was disenfranchised with the political system, cynical of all politicians looking to support their own political careers. After the wave of Jeremy Corbyn’s unexpected result in 2017, why was it to be too different this time? And would it have had that much of a consequence? The last five years have laid bare everything I could - and maybe should - have learnt before. There are no positive words to describe what Boris J...

Divisive politics: In defence of the "woke"

Waking up the morning of November 8th, to the new of Donald Trump's re-election as U.S President - I sighed. There was none of the shock or disappointment of his initial election eight years earlier, or the anger and incredulity of 6th January 2021, where Trump's emboldened supporters stormed the U.S Capitol building for the most ridiculous coup d'état attempt. No, instead, there was a grim sense of inevitability about the most divisive figure in modern global politics becoming the most powerful man in the world for a second time. Trump's election is symbolic. For this is a man who, since his formal intention to run for President in 2015 - has thrived on propelling division and hatred. Some of his many moments include questioning the legitimacy of Obama's birth certificate, making policy announcements on social media, and telling people to drink bleach to protect against COVID-19. It comes at a time where society seems at a crossroads, as social media misin...

Politics and the media

Search This Blog