Skip to main content

How do we rationalise things we intuitively know are wrong?

Over the past weekend, news of the Australian ‘ball-tampering’ scandal has rocked the cricketing world, and has dominated headlines around the world as a result.

In short, the Australian national team, led by captain Steve Smith, essentially attempted to change the condition of the ball – and thus gain an unfair advantage over their South African counterparts. It has been brandished as cheating by the experts and fans around the world and has cast huge doubt over where their team goes next.

After first hearing of the news, and I won’t deny it gave me a lot of glee; they are, after all, the perennial English villains in cricket, the actual scandal got me thinking. How are we, as people, able to rationalise something that we see fit, even if it goes against popular belief?
It can only be said that each individual action we take has distinct ramifications on our daily lives, and it seems to transpire into overall beliefs too. It would be unthinkable for any of us to suggest that we don’t have any irrational thoughts or contradict the common values of society.
Let me give you some examples, some more general, others specific instances.
See the source imageThe Australian cricket team is the first I want to touch on. Not for the fact that they have been caught cheating, but for the fact that in the previous few years they have gone around being playground bullies – sledging (basically verbally goading the opposition), and just being arrogant in general. Yet the day before they were exposed for the ball-tampering, their coach Darren Lehmann lodged a formal complaint to the sport’s governing body complaining about the South Africans getting too personal, claiming they had ‘crossed a line’.
Both the cheating and general nature combine when you are talking about rationality. The Australians aren’t stupid – they must have thought all their claims were rational and just, yet to the neutral eye, they weren’t.
In a more general sense, this can be applied to Western reaction to terrorism. Unsurprisingly, there is all this outrage when we are suspect to a vicious terrorist attack, but was the solution more violence after 9/11 and is it still the answer today? Probably not. Yet we rationalise it, choosing to ignore the fact that many civilians do get killed by Western forces in the Middle East and excusing our actions as a reaction to attacks on our society.
These examples are similar to the viewpoint of individual murderers, paedophiles, racists, sexists et al. It is unthinkable that, even if they have the desire to do these vile actions, that they can bring themselves to proceed with the knowledge of such devastating consequences. In those instances, it is once again clear that irrationality trumps all willpower.
I wonder what makes people believe stuff like this is right, it baffles me as to how our mind can lose focus of the measured approach that it takes through every day life.
That is not simply due to the fact that I just don’t agree with any of the aforementioned, people have their different views – that is what makes society what it is.
It is interesting to note how opinions change in the face of extreme emotion. The desire to kill a murderer may feel is an example of this, the attraction to children a paedophile might feel is another. It all stems down to this emotion – we let that get in the way of logical decision making.       
To me, it simply shows the incredible power of the mind, that we are able to make rational decisions nigh-on every minute. Yet there will still be moments where emotion will make decision-making too much. 
But that is ok, it should not be criticised. For emotion is what makes us all human beings. If we were rational in everything we did and said, we’d essentially be faultless robots. We can never see things from an objective point of view, we are naturally always concerned about how they will affect us and those around us.
Even now, although the Australian ball-tampering scandal brings shame upon cricket, a sport I follow so closely, I still feel immense joy at the Australian demise. I wonder if I can rationalise that.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

As Western governments wilfully ignore events in Palestine, they have lost the trust of their own people - and crucially, the Global South

It does not take a genius to spot the obvious contradictions in geopolitical narratives of Western governments and media evident over the past few decades. The US' post-9/11 botched "war on terror", that created a generation of instability in the Middle East, has served as the driver for European countries to lament the subsequent influx of migrants and legitimise the xenophobic desires of far-right parties. More recently, the same states have rightfully isolated Russia for their invasion of Ukraine - despite the similarity to their atrocities after 2001. Yet in the past three months, they have managed to brazenly exhibit their hypocrisy to an extent that I, and evidently many others, find astounding. And any long-time readers will know I've been more than happy to highlight duplicity of Western countries on this blog, so that should tell you something about how bizarre recent events feel. Source: UNRWA, via The Wire In response to the militant group Hamas' terror
Post a Comment
Read more

We must better consider all the people caught up in modern-day warfare

In some ways, this blog comes full circle to the very second post I wrote on  here circa six years ago .  That time, in the aftermath of the 2017 Las Vegas shooting, the blog focused on how names and stories appeal to our emotion more than facts and figures. Boy can I see the difference in writing style - 17 year old Kabir bizarrely quoted Stalin in making the point.  What I grappled with, and have done for a while since, is the unnatural and paradoxically natural emotional response to scales of tragedy. Hundreds of thousands dying is harder to comprehend than ten that are accompanied by names and faces. Yet more people dying is obviously worse globally. Ironically, I forgot the shooting’s details, which in itself encapsulates the point.  These limits of human empathy are (at least to me) fascinating, but they pose some problems in the globalised, interconnected world we now live in. In a world where our media consumption plays such a key role in how we perceive and interpret l
Post a Comment
Read more

Light at the End of the Tunnel

It is never a bad thing to ask for help, contrary to what the mind, or even society, might say. Unfortunately for me, whilst sat there in floods of tears at my kitchen table, the whole tissue box I had emptied littered on the floor, I didn’t realise it. It was a Wednesday evening in late January, I had just gone through a day of school feeling perfectly content – bar the worries many teenagers find themselves under. I recall feeling focused in the three lessons I had that day, and playing football in the afternoon, I imagined, would only help my mood. After all, they do say exercise helps balance the chemicals in your brain. But I got home, sat down and genuinely considered suicide. What possibly is there left here for me? How is it ever going to feel like life is worth living? The weeks of building anxiety and depression had taken their toll. School stress, A-levels closing in. Social stress (ever-increasing in an age where social media has become habitual). Coupled with en
Post a Comment
Read more