Skip to main content

Politics is becoming ugly through our insistence to focus on the negatives



Predictably, election fever has gripped the UK in the last few weeks, which will no doubt continue until we know the outcome of the December 12th election. It is a time where you get political propaganda emerging everywhere. Through the door in leaflets, on signs outside houses, on social media platforms, the list is endless. 

I was apathetic before campaigning for this general election began. In fact, I had been for a long time. Party politics is corrupting our nation, our leaders are lying through their teeth and, no matter what they will claim on each side, care very little about the people. To an extent, the chasm between politicians and people appeared irreversible. 

Yet now that an election has come to town, suddenly party identification is at the centre of discussion. Suddenly, everyone leans towards a party one way or another. Whether that is driven by the belief that they genuinely can change things, or attempting to choose the least worst option, the public have become more aligned to politicians.  
Somewhat obviously, the desire to have your political views represented in parliament is what drives this frenzy. No-one wants their vote to be rendered meaningless, have their future decided by people they don't believe are trustworthy or competent enough to lead the country. 

It is commendable to be passionate, but within these growing emotions lies a deeper, more troubling development. I have spoken vociferously about how divisive our society is, especially politically, but when the nation gets mesmerised by the prospect of an election and potential change, the most effective way of advocating for your chosen party's policies is to besmirching the opposition. 
Image result for politics 
In some ways, this may be necessary. After all, we all have to compare different political rhetoric to make a decision. But when Jeremy Corbyn, Boris Johnson and Jo Swinson are defaming each other's policies and character more than they are proposing viable policy options for themselves, we have to ask why political point-scoring has to be so viciously slanderous? 

Within this General Election, what positives have been talked of extensively? Political rhetoric is simply focused on apparent antisemitism in the Labour party, the supposed Conservative desire for privatisation of the NHS and the Liberal Democrats' suicidal policy of an instant revoke of Article 50 should they get into power. Labour's spending is criticised for its outlandishness, Johnson's behaviour attacked for appearing misogynistic and racist.  No matter what your political persuasion is, what your political views are - surely this is not how elections should work.

When a leader gets into power they are judged on what they do, what they change, the legacy they have. I couldn't give a toss about what Corbyn thinks a Johnson-led government will do, or vice-versa. I'm not a robot, I can make my own mind up about that, however favourable or damning that is. I want to know how they are going to change the country when they get in, so we can hold them to account when they naturally spout false promises. 

It is possible to find that, and granted, you do see some elements of party progression. But it is vastly overshadowed by the vitriol that undermines it. The issues that are naturally going to influence people's votes aren't progressive. Conversely, it is negative political coverage dominates mass media and social media. 

I'm not apathetic anymore. I am dismayed at how low people will go for power. At how low people will stoop to support their chosen party and leaders. It is nefarious and inhumane. It has got to the point where I see ordinary people coming to blows with each other over social media over the behaviour of a party leader who cares more about putting the opposition in its place than changing the country.

You can't solve anything through derogatory labelling. Nor through insults. Nor through plain arrogance. Yet all three are endemic within the political sphere and, particularly in the run up to an election, the social strata of the UK, and they render most political debate utterly meaningless.

Until we can't change the nature of how we conduct ourselves in politics and when our emotions run high, we will not progress at all. Politics will remain riddled with lies and corruption, which will leave most people dissatisfied anyway and create a more toxic, divisive atmosphere in our country and social circles (if that is even possible). 

That is not a political or social problem, it is a very severe human problem.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

As Western governments wilfully ignore events in Palestine, they have lost the trust of their own people - and crucially, the Global South

It does not take a genius to spot the obvious contradictions in geopolitical narratives of Western governments and media evident over the past few decades. The US' post-9/11 botched "war on terror", that created a generation of instability in the Middle East, has served as the driver for European countries to lament the subsequent influx of migrants and legitimise the xenophobic desires of far-right parties. More recently, the same states have rightfully isolated Russia for their invasion of Ukraine - despite the similarity to their atrocities after 2001. Yet in the past three months, they have managed to brazenly exhibit their hypocrisy to an extent that I, and evidently many others, find astounding. And any long-time readers will know I've been more than happy to highlight duplicity of Western countries on this blog, so that should tell you something about how bizarre recent events feel. Source: UNRWA, via The Wire In response to the militant group Hamas' terror...

With an election upon us, we must make sure to get some long-awaited change

 Hasn’t the last five years felt like a long time?  In the run up to the December 2019 General Election four and a half years ago, I remember using social media to say “do your own research, and go vote for whatever you believe in”. There was, and still is, some reason in that - youth turnout in politics is still so lamentably low, and it’s partly why we see political change that does nothing to help young people. So do please vote on Thursday. But perhaps I was overly naïve in the run-up to that election, because things are a lot different now. In 2019, I was disenfranchised with the political system, cynical of all politicians looking to support their own political careers. After the wave of Jeremy Corbyn’s unexpected result in 2017,  why was it to be too different this time? And would it have had that much of a consequence? The last five years have laid bare everything I could - and maybe should - have learnt before. There are no positive words to describe what Boris J...

Divisive politics: In defence of the "woke"

Waking up the morning of November 8th, to the new of Donald Trump's re-election as U.S President - I sighed. There was none of the shock or disappointment of his initial election eight years earlier, or the anger and incredulity of 6th January 2021, where Trump's emboldened supporters stormed the U.S Capitol building for the most ridiculous coup d'état attempt.  No, instead, there was a grim sense of inevitability about the most divisive figure in modern global politics becoming the most powerful man in the world for a second time.  Trump's election is symbolic. For this is a man who, since his formal intention to run for President in 2015 - has thrived on propelling division and hatred. Some of his many moments include  questioning  the legitimacy of Obama's birth certificate, making policy announcements on social media, and telling people to drink bleach to protect against COVID-19.  It comes at a time where society seems at a crossroads, as social media misin...