Skip to main content

England's infatuation with nationalism and racism is no shock - it's just elevated by football


The emotion around Sunday's Euro 2020 final should have stirred me. The biggest English football match in both mine and my parents' lifetime is a moment that ought to be savoured. Yet, in the aftermath of the past 24 hours, I feel not pain, but apathy. 

The sport I have followed religiously throughout my life has always had its reputation stained by violence and barbarism born out of the much-revered "firms" and hooliganism in the mid-20th century. Particularly in the international sphere, England fans have been cast aside and scolded for anti-social and disruptive behaviour.

For all that people like to claim those days are a far-cry from the current crop of fans, they are not. Think back to Euro 2016 and its infamous clashes with Russians in Paris. Just on Wednesday, there were stories of Danish fans as young as 9 being harassed and spat at - in the midst of a pandemic - after their semi-final defeat. Last night, hoards of ticketless England fans tried to get into Wembley to see the final defeat. The result was chaos and unsavoury scenes that have undoubtedly marred the experience of those fortunate enough to have witnessed the game.

The glaring omission is what has been front page news since the game. The online racist abuse aimed that Bukayo Saka, Marcus Rashford and Jadon Sancho is only another episode of "racism by social-media". The videos of people of colour being attacked after the game are to put it mildly, unsettling to watch. 
Credit: asianewsday.com

But contrary to the uproar and condemnation that the country has demonstrated in the aftermath of the game, this is not a shock. I wrote half of this blog the day before the final, because the neutrality I feel about England is fundamentally down to the bigotry it provides a platform for. It is a measure of white fragility that people are suddenly "standing up to injustice". Your words are empty because they are reactive. You will settle back into the bubble of privilege before it happens again - and then you'll be bothered to speak up. 

The stark irony is that the culpable England "fans" act in complete contrast to the members of the current squad they so brazenly support. Think Marcus Rashford and free school meals. Jordan Henderson and raising money for the NHS. The whole team and their support for the BLM and Rainbow Laces campaigns. They are a group of progressive young men having their say both on and off the pitch, led by a manager who seems all too aware of the power of unity and innovation. 

Therein lies the paradox. Most football fans, naturally, are supporting this young squad on their rocky journey to footballing idolism and commendable change out of football. They are happy to ignore the nationalist, racist and xenophobic culture that the adoration around the England team enables. You cannot take one without supporting the other - and it is impossible to cast aside that bigoted culture when it is contributing to a society that aims that bigotry at people like myself.

Football has wider problems with pretty much any social equality movement you can think of. Female football fans are still scolded, marginalised and ridiculed on the regular. I have seen and heard homophobic slurs used in football contexts, which is makes it wholly unsurprising that there are no openly gay footballers in the top 4 English divisions.

Perhaps the sanctimonious preaching may sound boring to you, for as many people have told me, it is after all "just a game". I will keep echoing this message until it actually reaches people, because it certainly isn't right now. This sport only enhances the discriminatory political culture that has allowed politicians to make openly prejudiced comments without fear of reprisal. Like it or not, English fanaticism actively encourages this.

At the end of the day, there's a football problem and there's an England problem. Or maybe there's just an "us" problem.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

As Western governments wilfully ignore events in Palestine, they have lost the trust of their own people - and crucially, the Global South

It does not take a genius to spot the obvious contradictions in geopolitical narratives of Western governments and media evident over the past few decades. The US' post-9/11 botched "war on terror", that created a generation of instability in the Middle East, has served as the driver for European countries to lament the subsequent influx of migrants and legitimise the xenophobic desires of far-right parties. More recently, the same states have rightfully isolated Russia for their invasion of Ukraine - despite the similarity to their atrocities after 2001. Yet in the past three months, they have managed to brazenly exhibit their hypocrisy to an extent that I, and evidently many others, find astounding. And any long-time readers will know I've been more than happy to highlight duplicity of Western countries on this blog, so that should tell you something about how bizarre recent events feel. Source: UNRWA, via The Wire In response to the militant group Hamas' terror...

With an election upon us, we must make sure to get some long-awaited change

 Hasn’t the last five years felt like a long time?  In the run up to the December 2019 General Election four and a half years ago, I remember using social media to say “do your own research, and go vote for whatever you believe in”. There was, and still is, some reason in that - youth turnout in politics is still so lamentably low, and it’s partly why we see political change that does nothing to help young people. So do please vote on Thursday. But perhaps I was overly naïve in the run-up to that election, because things are a lot different now. In 2019, I was disenfranchised with the political system, cynical of all politicians looking to support their own political careers. After the wave of Jeremy Corbyn’s unexpected result in 2017,  why was it to be too different this time? And would it have had that much of a consequence? The last five years have laid bare everything I could - and maybe should - have learnt before. There are no positive words to describe what Boris J...

Divisive politics: In defence of the "woke"

Waking up the morning of November 8th, to the new of Donald Trump's re-election as U.S President - I sighed. There was none of the shock or disappointment of his initial election eight years earlier, or the anger and incredulity of 6th January 2021, where Trump's emboldened supporters stormed the U.S Capitol building for the most ridiculous coup d'état attempt.  No, instead, there was a grim sense of inevitability about the most divisive figure in modern global politics becoming the most powerful man in the world for a second time.  Trump's election is symbolic. For this is a man who, since his formal intention to run for President in 2015 - has thrived on propelling division and hatred. Some of his many moments include  questioning  the legitimacy of Obama's birth certificate, making policy announcements on social media, and telling people to drink bleach to protect against COVID-19.  It comes at a time where society seems at a crossroads, as social media misin...